44 P. 805 | Cal. | 1896
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for trespasses committed by defendants by entering on his land, and tearing down about thirty feet of his boundary line fence, and digging up the soil, and destroying the grass and vegetation growing thereon, and also to obtain an
The principal question involved in the ease and presented for decision is: Was or was not the strip of land described in the answer shown by the evidence to be a public highway? It was proved that respondent settled upon his land in 1881,
We concur: Searls, C.; Haynes, C.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.