| N.J. | Sep 30, 1921

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Tkexcitaed, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoii, Black, Heepeniieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.