Sutin v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthoritySutin v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
A triable issue of fact exists as to whether defendant breached its duty to plaintiff to stop the bus at a place from which she could safely disembark and leave the area since the parties offer conflicting accounts regarding the positioning of the bus in relation to the curb when it came to a stop (see Malawer v New York City Tr. Auth., 6 NY3d 800 [2006], affg 18 AD3d 293 [2005]). Specifically, a triable issue of fact exists regarding how far from the curb the bus stopped.
We note, however, that plaintiff impermissibly raised a theory of liability in opposition to the motion that was not articulated in her notice of claim. The notice of claim states that the bus driver “failed to provide a safe location for passengers to exit“; her complaint contained a substantially similar allegation. Nowhere in her notice of claim, complaint or bill of particulars did plaintiff allege that the bus driver failed to “kneel,” i.e., lower, the bus prior to letting her off. Moreover, plaintiff‘s