82 N.Y.S. 995 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1903
Lead Opinion
This is an appeal from an order vacating an order which required the plaintiff to file security for costs, and permitting the prosecution of the action to be continued informa jpaujoens.
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disburse-ments, and the motion for leave to sue in forma pauperis denied, with ten dollars costs, and the order requiring security for costs reinstated.
Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and McLaughlin, JJ., concurred; Laughlin, J., dissented.
Dissenting Opinion
I dissent upon the ground that the responsibility of the guardian ad litem does not affect the right of the infant to prosecute the action in forma pauperis. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 458, 459; Feier v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 App. Div. 607.)
Order reversed, with ten 'dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs; and order requiring security reinstated.'