History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sullo v. State
663 So. 2d 11
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1995
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order summarily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion. Following Fountain v. State, 660 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings. If the record can answer the question of whether appellant is entitled to jail time credit, the rule 3.800(a) motion is appropriate for seeking relief. If that fact cannot be determined from the record, the rule 3.800(a) motion should be denied.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sullo v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 29, 1995
Citation: 663 So. 2d 11
Docket Number: No. 95-2587
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.