44 Wis. 595 | Wis. | 1878
The information charges that the defendant, with force and arms, being armed with a dangerous weapon, made an assault upon the body of one Adolph Klofonda, with
The court charged the jury: “If you find, in the first place, that it was not an offense as charged in the information, that of an assault with intent to commit the crime of murder, then, if you find that it was an offense which comes under the statute just read, that is, an assault with intent to do great bodily harm to the prosecuting'witness, you will say that you find the defendant guilty of an assault with intent to do great bodily harm, but not guilty of an assault with intent to commit murder,” etc.
The verdict of the jury was: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of an assault with intent to do great bodily harm, but not guilty of an assault with intent to commit the crime of murder.”
This verdict is precisely in the form directed by the court in the above instruction, and leaves out an essential element of the crime as defined in ch. 78, Laws of 1877, viz., “ being a/rmed with a dangerous weapon,” and does not warrant the judgment and sentence of imprisonment in the state prison. The verdict may be sustained by treating it as one for an assault merely, rejecting the words “ with intent to do great bodily harm” as surplusage; and so it should have been received, and the judgment and sentence should have been rendered under sec. 10, ch. 179, R. S. 1858, for an assault. Carpenter v. The People, 4 Scam., 198; People v. Vanard, 6 Cal., 562; Ex parte Max, 44 id., 586; People v. Murat, 45 id., 281; Ex parte Ah Cha, 40 id., 426; People v. Davis, 4 Parker, 61; Wilson v. The People, 24 Mich., 410; ch. 364, Laws of 1860; Benedict v. The State, 12 Wis., 314. It fol-Tows that the judgment must beset aside as erroneous, and the defendant should be sentenced under sec. 10, ch. 179, R. S. 1858, as for an assault.
By the Court. — The judgment of the circuit court is re