145 Misc. 484 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1932
In the answer to the petition it is alleged that the respondent for a certain specified period furnished electricity to a store occupied by the petitioner; that the charge for this service has not been paid; that although the petitioner was the actual consumer of electricity and the real occupant of the said store, the application for the service was made by his wife; that because of the non-payment of the aforesaid charge, the electricity furnished
Motion for peremptory order of mandamus is denied. An alternative order may, however, issue.