History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sulil Realty Corp. v. Rye Motors, Inc.
262 N.Y.S.2d 989
N.Y. App. Term.
1965
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed, without costs on the sole ground that title to the property in question was in the respondent, and not in the defendant, at the time the restraining notice was served.

Concur — Martuscbllo, Hogan and Ritchie, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Sulil Realty Corp. v. Rye Motors, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Jul 1, 1965
Citation: 262 N.Y.S.2d 989
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.