Sugarman v. State

Apr 29, 1914
No. 3105.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Habpeb
HABPEB, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and his punishment ‍​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‍assessed at a fine of $25.

The complaint and information allege that” the Christian name of appellant was unknown. When tried ‍​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‍he did not suggest what his name really was, and no motion in regard thereto was made. Ho statement of ‍​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‍facts accompanies the record; neither does it contain any motion for a new trial, nor any order on such motion ‍​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‍if any was filed, the recognizance taken in the ease reciting that an appeal had been taken to this court. ‍​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‍The complaint and information being sufficient, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.