3 La. Ann. 554 | La. | 1848
The judgment of the coui't was pronounced by
This appeal is taken on behalf of certain minor heirs of the deceased, Joseph Reeves, who reside in the State of Mississippi, from a certain final judgment homologating a tableau of distribution of proceeds of the effect» of the succession, presented by Edmond Reeves, administrator thoroof. The record comes up without any bill of exceptions or statement of facts. The ap-
The interests of minors and absentees in probate proceedings, have induced our predecessors, on all occasious, to require a compliance with this regulation on the part of those courts; and we do not think the new organization of our judiciary system, under the present constitution, has made any change in this salutary rule, which is to be strictly observed in all probate proceedings, although in ordinary courts no such rule of practice exists.
It appears to have been settled that a non-compliance with this article on the part of a court, can be taken advantage of by assignment of error on the appeal. Tompkins v. Benjamin, 16 La. 200. Graham v. Graham, Id. 203. De Armas v. De Armas, 17 Id. 115. The judgment appealed from was rendered by the judge of the parish of Lafayette. We do not deem it necessary to notice the other matters assigned as error by the appellant.
The judgment appealed from is, therefore, reversed, and the case remanded for anew trial, the administrator of the succession paying the costs of_this appeal.