History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sturckler v. Lux
233 A.D. 799
N.Y. App. Div.
1931
Check Treatment

Order reversed in part and motion granted so far as it relates to the subjects of examination specified in paragraphs numbered 2 and 3 in the notice, except that plaintiff’s examination shall include the subject of the ownership of the automobile at the time of the accident and any agreement or arrangements between the defendant Lux and the defendant corporation during the time of the employment of John Lux, respecting any permission granted by defendant corporation to Lux relating to the driving of the car; and otherwise affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Sturckler v. Lux
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1931
Citation: 233 A.D. 799
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.