History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stupin v. Sanchez
59 N.J. 240
| N.J. | 1971
|
Check Treatment
59 N.J. 240 (1971)
281 A.2d 377

ROBERT STUPIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PRIMITIVO SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 13, 1971.
Decided September 27, 1971.

Mr. Stephen Mongiello argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Martin L. Sisselman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. James & Addas, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Halpern (113 N.J. Super. 84).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Stupin v. Sanchez
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 27, 1971
Citation: 59 N.J. 240
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.