Studnicka v. Carlisle, 567 So. 2d 17

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioners who are represented by counsel should file pleadings only through counsel. A defendant who has court-appointed counsel may not act as co-counsel as a matter of right. Goode v. State, 365 So.2d 381 (Fla. 1978). Nonetheless, we have considered the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits, and deny the petition on each point raised. As to the issue of proper venue, our denial is without prejudice to address this issue in the trial court.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Studnicka v. Carlisle

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Sep 5, 1990

Citations: 567 So. 2d 17; 1990 WL 126384; 90-0820

Docket Number: 90-0820

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.