Studer v. WhitsellStuder v. Whitsell
Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Steuben County (Bradstreet, J.), entered October 9, 2001, which denied defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.
Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by Heath W. Studer (plaintiff) when the vehicle he was operating crossed into the opposite lane on a dirt road within the jurisdiction of defendant Town of West Union (Town) and struck a Town pickup truck operated by George A. Whitsell (defendant), Highway Superintendent for the Town. Plaintiff has no memory of the collision but does not dispute the fact that his vehicle crossed into the opposite lane and struck the truck operated by defendant. Defendants established that the yellow emergency lights on the Town’s truck were operating, that defendant observed plaintiffs vehicle cross into his lane of traffic and that he then drove the truck as far as possible to the right side of the road and slowed to a stop. Defendants therefore established as a matter of law that they were not negligent inasmuch as they established that the accident “was caused by plaintiffs crossing over into defendant [s’] lane of [traffic]” and striking the truck (Gouchie v Gill,