History
  • No items yet
midpage
Strout v. Stewart
63 Me. 227
Me.
1874
Check Treatment
Dickerson, J.

Though the verdict in this case is against the weight of the evidence, it is not so manifestly wrong as to require ■ the court to set it aside for that cause alone.

The newly discovered evidence is material and not cumulative, consisting mainly of the admissions of the defendant. As this evidence was not known to the plaintiff at the time of the trial, and could not have been discovered by him by the exercise of due diligence, and, as it is obvious, that, if introduced, it would have reversed the verdict, the motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered eviden ce is sustained, and a New trial granted.

Appleton, C. J., Walton, Barrows, Yirgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Strout v. Stewart
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1874
Citation: 63 Me. 227
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.