History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stroud v. State
225 S.W. 256
Tex. Crim. App.
1920
Check Treatment

The appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for one year.

By complaint and information regular in form and substance the appellant was charged with theft, and a verdict and judgment of conviction rendered. The charge of the court is not set out in the record, but in a misdemeanor case none is required unless requested. The facts are not before us, nor do we find any bills of exceptions. We must presume the trial regular, and the verdict supported by the evidence. An affirmance results.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Stroud v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 17, 1920
Citation: 225 S.W. 256
Docket Number: No. 5973.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.