History
  • No items yet
midpage
Strohecker v. Irvine
76 Ga. 639
Ga.
1886
Check Treatment
Blandford, Justice.

. The question here is, whether the lien of an attorney for services done and performed in defending a homestead against creditors and in preserving the same for the benefit of the beneficiaries therein is good and binding on the property so set apart ? We answer that it is. It is in the nature of labor done and purchase money thereon. Public policy demands this answer. Without some security of this sort those who are entitled to homestead exemptions might entirely fail of their rights without the benefit of the services of a lawyer; these services in procuring the land are as sacred and important as the services of the carpenter in building the house thereon, and stand upon the like footing of justice and equity.*

Judgment reversed.

Contrast Collier et al., ex'rs, vs. Simpson et al., 74 Ga., 697.

Case Details

Case Name: Strohecker v. Irvine
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 1, 1886
Citation: 76 Ga. 639
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.