Stroder v. State, 599 So. 2d 287

WOLF, Judge.

We affirm the convictions of the appellant for possession of cocaine with intent to sell, and sale of cocaine.

We reverse and remand the sentence of appellant, however, for a clarification by the trial court of the oral pronouncement which we find to be ambiguous. It is unclear whether the court intended to impose two consecutive nine-year sentences, or simply intended that the mandatory minimums run consecutively.¹

ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Notes

1 . We would note, however, that consecutive nine-year sentences appear to constitute a departure sentence.

Case Details

Case Name: Stroder v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jun 11, 1992

Citations: 599 So. 2d 287; 1992 WL 126581; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6262; No. 91-1262

Docket Number: No. 91-1262

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.