Stroble, Ricky Lee
WR-40,953-06
| Tex. App. | Sep 10, 2015
Case Information

*1 RE: WR 40,953 - 05 WR-46953-06

RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRININAL APPEALS SEP 102815 Abellate Sts. MerRous

Dear Clerk Abel Acosta

In the aboved numbered cause of action she filed a reply to States Reply to Appliant B wert of Habers Corpus. The reason is because like most courts they dont notify the proses of any action. So she enclosed a carbon copy of the reply. I ask you to except it and place with my cause(s) of action. I filed the aringals with the 506 Judicial District Court, on Sept 2nd. As you will see in the carbon copy of the order to that check.

I Thank you for your time. I remain your Humble servant.

Respectfully Ricky Strobl 15947D 12071 FM 3522 Abulay, TX 79601

*2 RE: 07-03-123326 08 - 02-12,771 of Sept 2th2015

Dear Clerk of Counts

I've liked a reply to states reply to Heobus Corpus 11,07 please beward to the counts of Criminal Appeals, and return the carbon copy, for my records after you time date stop it. I'm indigent at the time and the law library is paying for shipment. I thank you in advance.

Dear Hach Ireman you humble servant

Rely R. C. HY. STANDIE, DYN-SE 1594773

Rohr L. L. 12.071 EM 3522

Abclav, te 78601

*3 CAUSE NO 07-03-12,326

08.02-12,777

THE STATE OF TEXAS

  • 1 H 7 HE DISTEST COURT

  • 5 OF WALLER COUNTS TEXAS

  • 506° SUBSER DISTEST

APPLICANTS REPLY 70 STATES RESPONSE 70

APPLICANTS FOR WREY OF NABEAS COREUS

COMES NOW APPIIENT RELKYLLE STECKLE PROVSE (STECKLE)

to dispute several errors in the states response, to being 1.2 the HONORABLE LOUPS ATTENTION the following points of errors:

  1. ISSUE POINTS OF ERROR
  2. It is NOT his understanding that the state would remain silent during the summation position of the sentencing trial, instead It IS the understanding that the state would NOT make a RECOMMENDATION as to appropriate sentence, because the state had offered to make "NO RECOMMENDATION" in the plea agreement

*4 (See starts anyone pg 3 of 12 and 14) to which the state admitted that "State agrees to recommend: NO Recommendation (2N HAND written text). Now the state ad wants to say it was a "NO recommendation CAP". State wants the best of both worlds. Wants to offer a deal to keep it out of court, then breach the deal after it was signed by the House of Judge, DA' after, Mr. Shable and Mr. Cahill. 2. Even if attorney or Applicant (sraesie) would have objected to the Breach of a plea agreement". The only way to fix the sentence Recommendation of THE LIFE recommendation is a New Trial, because the Sentence Recommendation had already been put in front of the House of Judge. 3. 7EXAS CONSTITUTION AND STRENDER than its B2G brother, Federal Constitutions. ART 38.23 supra are mandatory terms" NO evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violations of ANY provision of the Constitution or LAN of the State of Texas or of the Constitution or law of the United State of America, shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal pose.

*5

  1. The Slatee response: There is uncontrwinted evidence that deferi- donts Attorney did not seek to obtain a hearing on a motion to suppress
  2. E 944 LY obtain evidence prior to any plea and sentencing hearing in either cause of action (see state response: pg 4 26) which proves ineffective assistance of counsel because He (PAN2U) did NOT try to sup pose the illegally obtain evidence. He must try or else it is in fact ineffective assistance.
  3. SHIE RPAY 227 Pg 4. Defendant (Apphant) was fully ad by trial counsel about the evidence that was obtained against the defendant though searches, seizures and voluntary turnovers by third parties, of relevant admissible evidence, Stable attorney stated that Melisse Magelin acted in "GOOD FASTH" Stable figured his lawyer would not 13c to him.
  4. ART I see 9, of the Texas Constitution and ARR 38.23 of the Texas code of Criminal Procedures will reinforce the facts that Melisse Magelin did in fact commit Burglary of studies house by going into Stables house into Stables backroom, into Stable duty, further hanger to get 3 well topics while looking for Change (see Forensic Futhings pg 2 4 Highlighted) (3).

*6 (See: Also R@ice Some Summary: Melissa admitted and police knew) Melissa Hogelie viewed the (3) Three types with minor children, then destroyed (one) kept gone) turn (one) over to the police to which it was used to obtain a warrant for Stubbles home. Their was never a OUT CEY from a victum. The Forensic Report (not submitted at that) or the Doctors report (not submitted by temper at that) was only obtain After Mr Stubb filed with the State RAK on Mr (obit). These documents PENUE ACTUAL UNIVERSITY as shown in (see Exhibit 11) Forensic Reports from the 3rd children center. 7. APREtants ATonley did object to the Phobas being enter in punishment trial. OVER RULD by Tudge. So that this objection should be re-viewable: It was objected to because their is no proof that the phobas belong to Stubbs because of EMERITIC Domain because their was (8) children ages (4th/19tham and (5) adult and (3) live in girlfinds and (6) mptoyers that had access to the computer to which had no pass code (2) of the other adult was register sex of Senders and had daughter (1) long and access to the same computer

*7 However the objection should also been because the evidence was illegally ob- tioin by a burglary of Studies house against the Towa Constitution victim (see exhibit 2) Jonschke V. State 147 SUSd 358 (2004) I that case the M.nurable Judge argued that the parents acted in 'Good failt' - the same term Mr. (chill (offarray) used, yet the court of Criminal Appeals said ART 38.27 must be read as it is written, and will IEDS SURVE AINENDS the statute if must enter EII as written, excluding ALL ILLÉGALLY obtained evidence. To which the state would not have case because of NO OUTCKY. 8. THERE IS NOT AND WAS NOT EVER AN OUTCKY FEUMAVILLUM. 9. The state used photos and gave the photos to the Children ceiters All (3) Three of them to try to teach a child that something happen (see line 23 and onsuce 24 ) 10. WITHOUT THE ILLÉGALLY ORTHOUS OEUZ DEEE THE state did not have a case at All, (see: eshitt) Children Asses ment lents (18) eightem months and 3 different centers the victim still repartly denied sexual abuse by RILKY STROOIE (Applicant)

*8

  1. STROBIES AT DORNEY (Broad Cahill) was fixed by the Honorable Judges of the county in every cause of action for the Honorable Judge referred and paid 811,062 R$ for his court appointed (see infibit 3)
  2. If 28 of states response. There is uncontroveted evidence that there was a No Recommendation (hand written text) as to punishment made by the State in a place agreement in fact the state said "Stubble was a murder and see deceive, a Murder change" and he deserves a like sentence. THAT is a recommendation by Supreme court standards. MASS
  3. If STROBIES AT DORNEY would have shown STROOIE the DOCTORS REPORT (not submit in court) or Extended Forensic Evolution (not submitter by court or transfer) STROOIE would have never entered into a place agreement to start with. All these reports supports Stubber Admet 3mocence claims and that then was NO OUTCRY vilems
  4. BRENTS J cahill affiaboid does he swear under oath or admit he is telling the truth to which If the Honorable counts would heve had a evidentiary hearing Mr. Cahill would have been place under oath to tell the truth. (1)

*9

  1. Mr. Stubb was not appointed counsel for this tobacco corpus as set out in Tex Lode Firm Ave Mar 26,04 16. The State did not reply to the Actual Innocence claim of on the 11.07 Hobras Corpus.

PRAVE Having reviewed the States answer as well as Applicand reply. The Applicant prays for relief due to Actual Innocence.

Respectfully submitted

Rickly szegert 159477

Wisconsin Section I swear under partaty of paying that the foregoing is here true and correct as well as offered in GOODFASH. executed on this day 2nd day of 1897 2015

Richy ler Stubb 159477 Robertson Unit 17.071 E11 3522 Abplom, 7179601