History
  • No items yet
midpage
Strickland v. Strickland
647 S.W.2d 70
Tex. App.
1983
Check Treatment

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by David Strickland from a divorce decree rendered July 1, *711982. No statement of facts was timely filed and Appellant filed his motion for an extension of time under Rule 21c TRCP, 16 days late. This Court has no authority to consider a late motion for extension of time to file a statement of facts. B.D. Click Co., Inc. v. Safari Drilling Corp., Tex., 638 S.W.2d 860.

Appellant appeals asserting the trial court abused its discretion in 4 particulars.

In the absence of a statement of facts it must be presumed on appeal that the evidence supports the verdict and the judgment of the trial court. Levitz Furniture Co. v. State, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NRE, 471 S.W.2d 452; Englander v. Kennedy, Tex., 428 S.W.2d 806; Giddings v. Simpson, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NWH, 532 S.W.2d 719.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Strickland v. Strickland
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 20, 1983
Citation: 647 S.W.2d 70
Docket Number: No. 10-82-114-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.