If personal property, when sold, is in the possession of a third person, and he is fully informed of the sale, by the parties, it is a sufficient explanation of the want of a change of possession, so that the sale is not fraudulent in law as to the creditors of the
vendor. To avoid the sale in such a case, fraud, in fact, must be proved. Kendall v. Fitts, 22 N.H. 1" court="None" date_filed="1850-12-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/kendall-v-fitts-8505458?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8505458">22 N.H. 1; Morse v. Powers, 17 N.H. 286" court="None" date_filed="1845-07-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/morse-v-powers-8504968?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="8504968">17 N.H. 286, 294; Pierce v. Chipman, 8 Vt. 334" court="Vt." date_filed="1836-02-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/pierce-v-chipman-6571871?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6571871">8 Vt. 334; Merritt v. Miller, 13 Vt. 416" court="Vt." date_filed="1841-02-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/merritt-v-miller-6572491?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6572491">13 Vt. 416, 419; Linton v. Butz, 7 Pa. St. 89; Nichols v. Patten, 18 Me. 231" court="Me." date_filed="1841-05-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/nichols-v-patten-4927267?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="4927267">18 Me. 231.
New trial granted.
ALLEN, J., did not sit.