History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stovall v. State
112 So. 925
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1927
|
Check Treatment

Several questions of merit were raised on the trial of this case. The court has, however, read the entire evidence, sitting en banc, and we are of the opinion that there is nothing in same which justified the question of *Page 693 the guilt vel non of the defendant being submitted to the jury. There are, it is true, one or two circumstances shown which might give rise to a very slight suspicion of his guilt; but this is, of course, not enough. The general affirmative charge, requested by appellant, should have been given, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Stovall v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 5, 1927
Citation: 112 So. 925
Docket Number: 7 Div. 325.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.