28 Ind. App. 502 | Ind. Ct. App. | 1902
John D. Stout, the owner of certain lands, title to which is in dispute, caused deeds for them to be prepared, the execution and validity of which depends upon whether they were delivered. The jury, with a general verdict for
Where one executes a deed and delivers it to a third person to hold until the death of the grantor, parting with all dominion over, and reserving no right to recall it, the delivery is effectual. Fifer v. Rachels, 27 Ind. App. 654. When the grantor reserves the right to recall such deed at his pleasure, there is no delivery. Fifer v. Rachels, supra; Osborne v. Eslinger, 155 Ind. 351, 80 Am. St. 240.
The reservation of the right to control or change the deed is inconsistent with the intention to deliver it. Vaughan v. Godman, 94 Ind. 191; Purviance v. Jones, 120 Ind. 162, 16 Am. St. 319; Anderson v. Anderson, 126 Ind. 62.
The law as expressed in the cases cited is applicable to the facts of this one, and requires an affirmance of the judgment. It is so ordered.