Stout v. Executors of Seabrook

| N.J. | Jun 15, 1880

Per Curiam.

This decree affirmed, for reasons given by the vice-chancellor in the case below, 8 Stew. Eq. 187.

For affirmance—Beasley, C. J., Depue, Knapp, Maghe, Scudder, Clement, Dodd, Green—8. For reversal—Dixon, Reed, Van Syckel—3.