History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stough v. Hatch
20 Alb. Law J. 78
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1879
Check Treatment
BENEDICT, District Judge.

This cause was upon the calendar of causes for trial, at the circuit of the supreme court of the state, at the January term, 1879. It was noticed for trial at that term, by the plaintiff, and a note of issue for that term was tiled by the plaintiff. It was not tried at that term, both sides having consented that the cause go off for the term. After the expiration of that term, application was made to the state court to remove the cause to this court, which application was granted. The plaintiff now’ moves this court to remand the cause to the state court, on the ground that the application to remove was made too late. This motion must be granted. The January term, 1879, was “the term at which said cause could be first tried.” within the meaning of the act of March 3, 1875 (18 Stat. 470,) for the cause was at issue, duly noticed for trial, and subject to be tried on its merits at that term. That the parties were not prepared for a trial at that term, and consented that the cause go off the calendar for that term, are facts that do not affect the question here.

Motion granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Stough v. Hatch
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
Date Published: May 1, 1879
Citation: 20 Alb. Law J. 78
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.