79 Tenn. 515 | Tenn. | 1883
delivered the opinion of the court.
By statute: “ There is also exempt from execution, in the hands of each mechanic in the State who is engaged in the pursuit of his trade or occupation, one set of mechanic’s tools, such as are usual and necessary to the pursuit of his trade.” ' Walker having recovered a judgment against Story, who was a photographer, caused an execution thereon to be levied on a set of photographer’s instruments and outfit, the property of Story, consisting of a photographic tent, and the usual tools and instruments used by an artist or photographer in taking pictures, such as bins, camera *box, camera stand, head-rest, bath holder, etc., worth less than fifty dollars in all. The parties made up an agreed case in writing, setting out the foregoing facts, and submitted the same to the circuit court. The circuit judge held that the articles levied on were'not exempt from execution under the statute, and Story appealed from his judgment. The Referees have reported in favor of an affirmance.
The Legislature of this State has not treated photographers as mechanics, but as photographic artists, and subjected their avocation to.a privilege tax: Rev. Code, sec. 553 a, sub-sec. 29, and subsequent statutes. The exemption act first above quoted exempted also “to each mechanic, who is the head of a family, fifty dollars worth of lumber or material.” The amount
The judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed. The costs below should have been divided under the Code, section 3453. But the record does not show any objection to the judgment rendered, under these circumstances, we think that the entire costs of the cause should now be equally divided between the parties.