History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stores v. Snow
1 Root 181
Conn. Super. Ct.
1790
Check Treatment

*182The defendant offered evidence to prove that both the note, and the mortgage given to secure it, were fraudulent, and done to avoid creditors. But by the court not admitted, for a fraudulent conveyance is good between the parties; although it is void as to creditors.

Case Details

Case Name: Stores v. Snow
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1790
Citation: 1 Root 181
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.