Stonebraker v. State, 594 So. 2d 351

FRANK, Judge.

We affirm Stonebraker’s convictions and sentence, including the imposition of a fine and restitution, but we remand for the trial court to strike conditions of probation relating to alcohol use or visiting premises upon which alcohol or intoxicants are sold on the ground that such conditions are unrelated to the crime of grand theft for which Sto-nebraker was convicted. Daniels v. State, 583 So.2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Stonebraker v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Mar 6, 1992

Citations: 594 So. 2d 351; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 659; 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2397; No. 91-00328

Docket Number: No. 91-00328

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.