| Mass. | Mar 1, 1912

Hammond, J.

While crossing the tracks of the defendant on Washington Street in this city, near Guild Street, about nine o’clock in the forenoon of August 3, 1907, the plaintiff’s intestate, a man then sixty-three years of age, was struck by a car and killed.

The accident occurred in broad daylight. There is no evidence that the deceased received any invitation from the defendant or any one else to cross, nor that there were any other vehicles to complicate the situation or to distract his attention at the precise time of the accident. Nor was there anything to shut off the view of the car for at least five hundred feet from the place of the accident. There was no wind or rain to interfere with his view or to distract or require his attention; nor does it appear that he became suddenly confused. If the witnesses for the plaintiff are to be believed, the intestate, seeing a rapidly moving car approaching, deliberately attempted to cross when it was so near that the attempt was rash in the extreme. The case falls far short of showing due care on his part. It-is clearly distinguishable from *366Albee v. Boston Elevated Railway, 209 Mass. 6" court="Mass." date_filed="1911-05-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/albee-v-boston-elevated-railway-co-6431435?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6431435">209 Mass. 6, upon which the plaintiff relies, and it must be classed with Haynes v. Boston Elevated Railway, 204 Mass. 249" court="Mass." date_filed="1910-01-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/haynes-v-boston-elevated-railway-co-6430897?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6430897">204 Mass. 249, and similar cases.

Exceptions overruled.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.