History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stolle v. Kanetzky
238 S.W. 724
Tex. App.
1922
Check Treatment

We are loath to disturb the verdict of a jury upon issues of fact in any case, and especially so in this case, as there have been two verdicts in favor of appellee; but the evidence, both as to the insanity of Christian Stolle, and as to the undue influence of August Stolle, is so unsatisfactory that we feel we ought not to let the judgment in this case stand. Perhaps upon another trial one or the other of the parties to this suit may be able to produce more satisfactory evidence on the issues involved.

For the reason that the verdict of the jury is against the overwhelming weight of the testimony, this case is reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded. *Page 725

Case Details

Case Name: Stolle v. Kanetzky
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 2, 1922
Citation: 238 S.W. 724
Docket Number: No. 6408.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.