History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stoganovic v. Dinolfo
61 N.Y.2d 812
NY
1984
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 729).

*814Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Simons.

Case Details

Case Name: Stoganovic v. Dinolfo
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 16, 1984
Citation: 61 N.Y.2d 812
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.