History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stockbridge v. Commissioner
1925 BTA LEXIS 2461
B.T.A.
1925
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

*328OPINION.

Ivins:

We are satisfied by evidence submitted by the taxpayers-,, and uncontroverted, that depreciation should be allowed the partnership for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1919, in the amount of $29,698.73.

The item of $22,000 was not a proper deduction for the fiscal year in question. At the end of that year it represented not an accrued liability but a reserve.

During the fiscal year in question claims existed only in contemplation, not in fact. They did not arise and so accrue until after the-close of the fiscal year. Appeal of Consolidated Asphalt Co., 1 B. T. A. 79; Appeal of Henry Reubel, 1 B. T. A. 676; Appeal of Uvalde Co., 1 B. T. A. 932; Appeal of William J. Ostheimer, 1 B. T. A. 18.

Case Details

Case Name: Stockbridge v. Commissioner
Court Name: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Date Published: Jul 11, 1925
Citation: 1925 BTA LEXIS 2461
Docket Number: Docket Nos. 1866, 1867, 1875, 1916, 1917.
Court Abbreviation: B.T.A.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.