101 Iowa 85 | Iowa | 1897
Under our view of this case we need consider but one. question made, and that is, whether facts constituting an estoppel as against T. K. Scott-horn, the plaintiffs’ grantor, have been established. If such facts are proven, then plaintiffs have no interest in this land, regardless of the prior adjudication pleaded, or of the alleged acceptance by said Scott-horn under the will of his former wife. While the evidence is conflicting, still we think the district court might well find, from the evidence, as plaintiffs claim it in fact did, that T. K. Scotthorn had, by his acts, estopped himself from claiming any interest in the land. We do not, in such cases, enter into an