History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stillman v. Johnson
55 N.J. Eq. 592
New York Court of Chancery
1897
Check Treatment
Per Cijriam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

Stillman v. Johnson—

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

For reversal — None.

Freshmuth v. Johnson—

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Stillman v. Johnson
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Mar 15, 1897
Citation: 55 N.J. Eq. 592
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.