midpage

Stillman v. JohnsonStillman v. Johnson

New Jersey Court of Chancery
Mar 15, 1897
Versions:55 N.J. Eq. 592
Per Cijriam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

Stillman v. Johnson—

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

For reversal — None.

Freshmuth v. Johnson—

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Stillman v. Johnson
Court Name: New Jersey Court of Chancery
Date Published: Mar 15, 1897
Citation: 55 N.J. Eq. 592
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Ct. of Ch.
Log In