History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stewart v. Wainwright
206 So. 2d 211
Fla.
1968
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this cause should be discharged on the ground that petitioner has failed to show a timely pursuit of appellate remedies in proceedings presenting the same issues under Rule 1, Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, Stewart v. State, Fla.App., 159 So.2d 681. See Mitchell v. Wainwright, Fla.1963, 155 So.2d 868; Hillhouse v. State, Fla.1963, 159 So.2d 228; Zuniga v. State, *212Fla.App. 1966, 184 So.2d 659, cert. dis. 189 So.2d 635, cert. denied 385 U.S. 962, 87 S.Ct. 404, 17 L.Ed.2d 307.

CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Stewart v. Wainwright
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jan 17, 1968
Citation: 206 So. 2d 211
Docket Number: No. 36869
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.