History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stevenson v. Bannan
227 Pa. 498
Pa.
1910
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

March 21, 1910:

The terms of the agreement on which the action is founded are not clear, but it appears from them that it was the intention of the parties that the plaintiff should procure a buyer, not that he should be paid a commission in any event. The order of the court discharging the plaintiff’s rule for judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Shay.

Case Details

Case Name: Stevenson v. Bannan
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 15, 1910
Citation: 227 Pa. 498
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 353
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.