Stern v. Ward

94 N.J.L. 279 | N.J. | 1920

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchaxd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Svayze, Barker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black., White, Heppenheimer, Wllliams, Taylor, Gardner, Acicerson, JJ. 14.

For reversal—Alone.