History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stephenson v. Gillaspie
23 Ind. App. 187
Ind. Ct. App.
1899
Check Treatment
• Black, J. —

The appellant has assigned here that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the second paragraph of the appellee’s reply, and that the court erred in its conclusions of law upon the findings' of fact in a special finding. The transcript of the.Record before us does not set forth a final judgment in the cause or show that one was rendered. Thereforé, the questions discussed in the briefs of counsel can not be decided by us in this case. Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Stephenson v. Gillaspie
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 31, 1899
Citation: 23 Ind. App. 187
Docket Number: No. 2,929
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    Stephenson v. Gillaspie, 23 Ind. App. 187