Stephens v. StateStephens v. State
Appellant raises only one point on appeal from his conviction for robbery with a firearm. He contends that the trial court erred in refusing to give to the jury his requested instruction on robbery without a weapon (strong arm robbery), which he says is a category III necessarily included offense one step removed from the offense of robbery with a firearm, so as to require reversal under the principles announced in Brown v. State,
The refusal to give an instruction on a lesser included offense one step removed from the crime for which a defendant is convicted is reversible error. State v. Abreau,
Here, appellant was charged with (and convicted of) robbery with a firearm under section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1977). That section proscribes robbery with a firearm or a deadly weapon. Appellant contends that robbery with a weapon, section 812.13(2)(b), is not a necessarily included offense of robbery with a firearm or other deadly weapon because the statutory definition of “weapon”
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Notes
. § 790.001(13), Fla.Stat. (1977).