History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stephens v. Pennsylvania
55 S. Ct. 353
SCOTUS
1935
Check Treatment

Appeal from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed upon the ground that the jurisdictional statement fails to disclose any properly presented substantial federal question. Rule 12. Rosen v. Fry, 293 U. S. 526. Leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Stephens v. Pennsylvania
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 14, 1935
Citation: 55 S. Ct. 353
Docket Number: No. 610
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.