171 Wis. 625 | Wis. | 1920
The circuit court correctly held that the third finding did not decide any issuable fact, but we think it erred in granting a .new trial notwithstanding the defect in such finding, because the verdict is complete without it. The jury found that defendant was negligent in the course of his treatment of plaintiff; that such negligence was the proximate cause of plaintiff's injury; and that plaintiff was free from any contributory negligence and sustained damages. Such verdict, if supported by evidence, sufficiently establishes liability.
As to defendant’s negligence, the evidence showed that he used what is termed an injection method to cure hernia. It seems from defendant’s testimony that the idea is that by injecting a fluid into the tissues in or adjacent to the upper
By the Court. — Order reversed, and cause remanded with directions to affirm the judgment of the civil court.