History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stengel v. Morehead
194 Misc. 1027
N.Y. App. Term.
1949
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Having entered into possession with permission of the one entitled to possession, respondent is not a squatter or intruder within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (Williams v. Alt, 226 N. Y. 283; Frazier v. Cropsey, 124 Misc. 367.) Birdie Management Corp. v. Dunton (60 N. Y. S. 2d 673) is distinguishable, as there the *1026decision was based upon an unlawful entry. Failure to obtain a certificate from the city rent commission authorizing institution of this proceeding also required dismissal of the petition.

The final order should be affirmed, without prejudice to the institution of a new proceeding upon obtaining certificate of eviction from city housing commission.

Hammeb and Heoht, JJ., concur; Edeb, J., concurs in result.

Final order affirmed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Stengel v. Morehead
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Mar 10, 1949
Citation: 194 Misc. 1027
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.