History
  • No items yet
midpage
Steinman v. Russell
246 N.Y.S.2d 994
N.Y. App. Div.
1964
Check Treatment

Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, without costs. In view of the improper remarks made by counsel during summation, although not sufficient to warrant a reversal of the judgment, costs are not awarded to the prevailing party. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Steinman v. Russell
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 30, 1964
Citation: 246 N.Y.S.2d 994
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.