History
  • No items yet
midpage
Steimer v. Boise Cascade Corp.
675 P.2d 517
Or. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded to the Board to determine under ORS 656.295(5) whether the case should be remanded to the referee, because it has been “improperly, incompletely or otherwise insufficiently developed or heard by the referee.” Bailey v. SAIF, 296 Or 41, 672 P2d 333 (1983).

Case Details

Case Name: Steimer v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Feb 15, 1984
Citation: 675 P.2d 517
Docket Number: 81-08623; CA A28143
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.