Stegman v. Civil Service Commission of the State
117 N.J.L. 422
N.J.
1937
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 11.

For dismissal — CASE, PERSKIE, JJ. 2.