History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stearns v. Hibben Dry Goods Co.
11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553
Oh. Circ. Ct., Hamilton
1908
Check Treatment

The ruling -of the Superior Court in General Term upon a demurrer should, when the case is transferred to this court, be followed unless clearly erroneous.

The petition discloses no misrepresentation by the board of directors upon which the pl-aintiff relied to his prejudice, nor the concealment by them of any fact not recorded in the minutes, which, -on demand, were open to inspection by the plaintiff as a stockholder. - '

Whatever be the nature of the trust created by the resolution of the board of directors -on January 10th, 1898, it terminated on or before June 30th, 1899, more than six years before the commencement of the action.

Although a demand was necessary before beginning the action, the failure to make demand did not suspend the operation of the statute of limitations. Hawk v. Minnick, 19 O. S., 462; Douglass v. Corry, 46 O. S., 349; Townsend v. Eichelberger, 51 O. S., 213.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Stearns v. Hibben Dry Goods Co.
Court Name: Hamilton Circuit Court
Date Published: Dec 19, 1908
Citation: 11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553
Court Abbreviation: Oh. Circ. Ct., Hamilton
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.