Steakin v. Voicestream Wireless Corp.Steakin v. Voicestream Wireless Corp.
Summary judgment was properly denied to all parties on the issue of liability, there being an issue of fact as to whether, inter alia, plaintiff‘s failure to use a furnished safety device was the sole proximate cause of the accident (see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d 280 [2003]). We modify as above indicated because the subject agreement, inter alia, limits Cross State‘s right to indemnification to ECS‘s proportionate fault for the accident, as to which issues of fact exist. We have considered the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing.
Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.