History
  • No items yet
midpage
Staton v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company
301 Ga. App. 214
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2009
|
Check Treatment
687 S.E.2d 271 (2009)

STATON et al.
v.
STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. A08A1606.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

November 20, 2009.

David F. Guldenschuh, Rome, for Appellants.

Magruder & Sumner, J. Clinton Sumner, Jr., John A. Owens, Martin Snow, Cubbedge Snow, Jr., Thomas P. Allen, III, Macon, for Appellee.

ELLINGTON, Judge.

In this underinsured motorist coverage case, the trial court found as a matter of law that Cecil Staton was not entitled to "stack" underinsured motorist ("UM") coverage from his employer's automobile insurance policies which covered vehicles that were not involved in the car accident in which he was injured. Staton appealed, and we reversed the trial court's decision in Staton v. State Farm etc. Ins. Co., 294 Ga.App. 208, 669 S.E.2d 164 (2008). The Supreme Court of Georgia granted certiorari and reversed our decision in State Farm etc. Ins. Co. v. Staton, 286 Ga. 23, 685 S.E.2d 263 (2009). Accordingly, our decision in Staton v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., 294 Ga.App. 208, 669 S.E.2d 164 (2008), is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.

Judgment affirmed.

MILLER, C.J., and BLACKBURN, P.J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Staton v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 20, 2009
Citation: 301 Ga. App. 214
Docket Number: A08A1606
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.