1 Conn. App. 517 | Conn. App. Ct. | 1984
After a trial by the court the defendant was found guilty of crossing a median divider on Route 52 in violation of General Statutes
None of the items requested in the motion for discovery and denied by the court3 is discoverable as of right. See Practice Book 741. Section 745 of the Practice Book permits additional disclosure in the court's discretion, but only upon a showing of good cause. The defendant did not make this showing. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
The second issue raised by the defendant concerns the denial of his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Practice Book 815(4). The defendant argues that his "arrest" was invalid because the state trooper was not in uniform and displayed no badge identifying himself as a trooper. Even if this were so, it would not bar prosecution of the defendant or be a defense to a valid conviction. State v. Gallagher,
The defendant next challenges the court's ruling that testimony by the officer as to his occupation is not *519
hearsay. That testimony was not an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted therein. See State v. Gunther,
There is no error.
In this opinion the other judges concurred.