History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Zurawski
219 A.2d 614
| N.J. | 1966
|
Check Treatment
47 N.J. 160 (1966)
219 A.2d 614

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MERDIE ZURAWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 25, 1966.
Decided May 9, 1966.

Mr. Hyman Isaac argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Barry Epstein, on the brief; Messrs. Reibel, Isaac & Tannenbaum, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney.)

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brown in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO. — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Zurawski
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 9, 1966
Citation: 219 A.2d 614
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.